Over the last few years, investors have increasingly become interested in aligning their decisions to positively impact the environment and society. The ESG framework (Environmental, Social, and Governance) is frequently used to define companies dedicated to sustainable business practices, social effect, and moral governance, all affiliated with the investors’ personal beliefs and principles. It is interesting to note that ESG is not restricted to a kind of approach. It can be applied with diverse perspectives depending on the nature of the industry and the investment specifications. 

Two common positions regarding sustainable investment are ‘ESG Investing’ and ‘ESG integration.’ The objective of this article is to clarify the misconception of the two terms that are often used interchangeably. 

What is ESG Investing?

ESG investing is frequently referred to as a method of investing “sustainably”—where investments are made while considering the economy, the environment, and human welfare. It is founded on the expanding premise that environmental and social variables have an increasing impact, both directly and indirectly, on the financial success of enterprises. Simply put, ESG investing refers to investment methods in businesses or assets that integrate ESG criteria with traditional financial research.

In general, investing includes everything from traditional investment methods to philanthropy, with theme, impact, and negative and positive screening in between. In a nutshell, a traditional investing strategy focuses on financial returns with limited integration of ESG throughout research, with a relatively low result. The returns on financial expectations are, however, quite substantial.

When met in the middle, positive screening in the range of investing consists of an approach that seeks companies or businesses with high ESG scores or ratings. Impact investing has high ESG factors, high impact expectations, and high financial returns. ESG aspects are broken down into stakeholder concerns, industry norms, social trends, legal and policy causes, financial consequences and risks, and possibilities for development. In contrast, corporate philanthropy’s only goal is to provide social benefits, typically by making cash donations directly to nonprofit groups. Philanthropy is defined as an action that requires no financial gain. In a nutshell, ESG investing seeks to combine financial returns with environmental, social, and ethical principles with long-term, competitive, and risk-adjusted returns.

Furthermore, sustainable investing can focus on both ESG principles and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs). Companies with mature ESG profiles have integrated their financial and corporate development teams to integrate ESG forecasting and acquisition models.  

ESG Integration

ESG Integration is the process of identifying material risks, opportunities, and impacts relevant to the financial performance of investment portfolios. It is also an investment approach incorporating ESG factors, other economic analyses, and governing requirements into the management process. ESG Integration focuses on the importance of a company’s performance and business value. It identifies, analyzes, and evaluates ESG factors and their intercorrelation with potential financial impacts such as returns, margins, and risks.

ESG Integration is not preceding portfolio returns. In fact, it integrates ESG factors into financial models to create a more comprehensive model with environmental, sustainable, social, and ethical governance. ESG Integration withholds corporate pressure and stakeholder expectations. For instance, large established investors profess that ESG factors guide their investment decisions, especially climate-related risks.

Integration of ESG must provide progress on ESG issues and enhanced disclosure and reporting. Supply chain and customers are all part of ESG integration, forming a large chunk of the company’s footprint and respective impacts. Supply chain ESG maturity is critical for investors.

The drivers behind ESG Integration include global concerns about climate change, increasing attention to social justice and equity issues, corporate social responsibility (CSR), and profitable investments. Recognition for benchmarking against the industry is also a complimentary goal. 

However, there are difficulties and challenges regarding standardization, transparency, and data availability. The lack of standard measures and data on ESG aspects makes comparing ESG performances across different companies, particularly for privately held businesses. Overall, ESG Integration is gaining momentum and may continue to play an important role in investment decisions.

Differences between ESG Investing and ESG Integration

The main difference between ESG Investing and ESG Integration is how they manage risk. ESG Investing requires avoidance of companies and industries that are considered risky from an ESG perspective. On the other hand, ESG Integration is well organized, runs from an ESG standpoint, and is not exposed to any related risks. 

Another main difference is the focus on working with companies. ESG Investing tends to use shareholder activism and engagement to encourage the company to improve its ESG performance as a whole. In contrast, ESG Integration’s main objective is to incorporate companies with a better understanding of ESG practices and ESG strategies to improve a company’s overall performance in the ESG realm.

Another difference is that ESG Investing is a positive screening approach that seeks and invests in companies with high ESG ratings. Comparatively, ESG Integration is a risk management method that integrates ESG factors into the investment process. ESG Investing is driven by values or interests that target sustainability, social and governance impact, and financial returns. In opposition, ESG Integration aims to deliver competitive financial returns and reduce investment risks by assessing material factors, opportunities, and risks. 

In conclusion, ESG Investing has become increasingly widespread among investors. It aims to identify and invest in companies with high ESG scores or ratings that align with investor values. In contrast, ESG Integration considers ESG factors along with financial analysis and regulatory requirements to reduce investment risk. However, both methods share the main underlying objective of delivering competitive financial returns while incorporating ESG factors into investment decisions.

Want to know more about ESG or how Alpin’s ESG Consultants can help your business specifically?

Reach out to us at contact@alpinme.com or give us a call at +971-2-234-6198